University of Mumbai Faculty Positions — Corrigendum Update and Exactly What You Must Do Now
Why this update matters (read first)
The University of Mumbai (India) has issued a corrigendum covering 152 aided teaching positions—including Deans of Faculties, Professors, Associate Professors/Deputy Librarian, and Assistant Professor/Assistant Librarian. It reopens the process with revised rules, requires fresh online applications and ATR from earlier applicants, and sets a new hard-copy deadline. Always verify details on the University’s official site before acting.
What changed at a glance
-
-
Posts covered: 152 aided teaching positions (Deans, Professors, Associate Professors/Deputy Librarian, Assistant Professor/Assistant Librarian).
-
Fresh application required:
Candidates who had applied earlier under the referenced advertisement must submit fresh online applications and an updated Academic, Teaching & Research Credential (ATR) with self-attested proofs. -
Fee waiver for earlier applicants:
Previously applied candidates do not need to pay the fee again when resubmitting. -
New fee for fresh applicants:
₹500 (Open category) and ₹250 (Reserved category). -
Hard-copy requirement:
Printout of the online application and the ATR must be submitted in three sets, self-attested, to the Inward Section, Room No. 25, University of Mumbai, Fort, Mumbai – 400 032. -
Hard-copy last date:
Parcels must reach the Inward Section before 3 December 2025. -
Weightage rule (revised procedure):
ATR = 75%, Interview= 25% (as per Government Resolution referenced in the corrigendum). -
Submission mode:
Online application + ATR upload, followed by hard-copy submission (three sets).
-
Context and background you should know
Why a corrigendum?
The corrigendum references the earlier advertisement (and a prior corrigendum) and aligns MU’s teacher recruitment with the revised state procedure intended to make the process more transparent, objective, and effective. The policy introduces a clear 75%:25% split between the Academic, Teaching & Research credentials (ATR) and Interview Performance, respectively. Practically, your paperwork quality and evidence alignment now carry even more weight.
What the 75% ATR weightage means for you
Because the ATR forms the majority of the score, you must:
-
-
Map every claim (teaching, research, extension, service, administration) to documentary evidence.
-
Ensure consistency across the CV, application, ATR, and annexures (names, titles, dates, ISSNs/ISBNs/DOIs, page ranges).
-
Structure annexures in exact ATR order so evaluators can locate proofs without cross-referencing multiple bundles.
-
Who needs to act (and how)
Category A: Candidates who already applied earlier
-
-
File a fresh online application for the same post/subject
under this corrigendum. -
Generate and fill the ATR again; attach self-attested proofs for each claim.
-
Do not pay the application fee again.
-
Print the application and ATR; prepare three complete sets (self-attested, paginated, indexed).
-
Dispatch so the packet reaches the Inward Section (Room 25, Fort Campus) before 3 December 2025.
-
Category B: Fresh applicants
-
-
Complete the online application and generate the ATR with all evidence.
-
Pay the fee: ₹500 (Open) or ₹250 (Reserved). Keep the receipt and include a copy in every set.
-
Print the application and ATR; prepare three sets (self-attested, paginated, indexed).
-
Dispatch to the Inward Section (Room 25) so it reaches before 3 December 2025.
-
Exact documents you should assemble (three identical sets)
-
-
Printed online application (signed).
-
ATR (complete, signed) with section-wise, self-attested proofs:
-
Teaching evidence: workload summaries, course outlines, outcome documentation.
-
Research outputs: first page/DOI of publications, patents, creative works (discipline-appropriate).
-
Grants/projects: sanction orders, completion certificates, PI/Co-PI roles.
-
Service/administration: committee orders, minutes, appointment letters.
-
Awards/fellowships: notifications, certificates.
-
-
Eligibility proofs: UG/PG/PhD degrees, NET/SET (where applicable).
-
Experience certificates: designate role, nature (CHB/adhoc/regular), and
exact dates. -
Category/reservation certificates (as applicable) in the prescribed format.
-
Fee receipt (fresh applicants only).
-
Index + pagination matching ATR headings (vital for quick verification).
-
Formatting rule of thumb: name files/sections to mirror ATR headings word-for-word. This reduces screening time and prevents “evidence not traceable” remarks.
How to maximize the 75% ATR score
1) Curate quality over quantity
Prioritize high-quality, peer-reviewed outputs and discipline-recognized venues (UGC-CARE/SCI/Scopus or accepted creative standards). Add stable identifiers (DOI/ISSN/ISBN) and ensure authorship order is consistent across documents.
2) Make teaching evidence visible
Attach syllabi, assessment blueprints, outcome mapping tables, and feedback synopses. Where relevant, include innovative pedagogy (blended learning, labs/studios, community projects) with brief one-page notes linking outcomes to evidence.
3) Prove service and leadership
Summarize committees, accreditations, curriculum revisions, extension work, and document each with orders, memos, or official minutes. Keep every item traceable.
4) Use a one-page ATR index
At the very front of each set, place a one-page index mapping ATR subsections → annexure numbers → page ranges. Evaluators will thank you, and you’ll minimize follow-ups.










